Clinical Implantation of Retinal Prostheses: What Have We Learned in 3 years?

Gislin Dagnelie

doi:10.1364/ISA.2015.IM3A.1

Imaging and Applied Optics 2015
OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2015),
paper IM3A.1
•https://doi.org/10.1364/ISA.2015.IM3A.1

Clinical Implantation of Retinal Prostheses: What Have We Learned in 3 years?

Gislin Dagnelie

Imaging Systems and Applications 2015

Arlington, Virginia United States
7–11 June 2015
ISBN: 978-1-943580-00-2

From the session
IS: Optogenetics, Vision Restoration and Retinal Implants I (IM3A)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
G. Dagnelie, "Clinical Implantation of Retinal Prostheses: What Have We Learned in 3 years?," in Imaging and Applied Optics 2015, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optica Publishing Group, 2015), paper IM3A.1.

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

The Argus II (US/Europe) and Alpha IMS (Europe) retinal implants have been approved for clinical use, and with over 100 implantees we report early benefits compared to blindness, but many hurdles yet to be overcome.

PDF Article

More Like This

Eye-Tracked Extraocular Camera for Retinal Prostheses

F. E. Sahin, B. P. McIntosh, P. J. Nasiatka, J. D. Weiland, M. S. Humayun, and A. R. Tanguay
FTu2C.3 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2015

Elastic-scattering spectroscopy for cancer detection: What have we learned from preliminary clinical studies?

Irving J Bigio
FTuL4 Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2004

Worldwide field trials: what have we learned?

G. Pellegrini
WA1 Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 1983

Previous Article Next Article