Abstract

An elaborate study of twenty-eight scientific controversies found that a high percentage of later-born scientists supported theories challenging accepted beliefs. This report, reprinted by permission from the Science Section of The New York Times of 8 May 1990, suggests that scientists who are not first-borns may be less likely to identify with authority.

© 1991 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (1)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription